Our Amazin’ Bayesian Brains [B]

This Post is the second in a series that began with Crazy Eyes / Beautiful Minds. You don’t have to read that one first, but it’s recommended…

We are constantly being exposed to outside ‘noise’, inputs to our various senses. Stop what you are doing and without moving your head, notice what else you can see in your field of vision. Next, close your eyes and listen to all the ambient noise around you. Now get in touch with your body, anything that might be touching you, any tastes in your mouth, any itches, smells.

…and that’s just the external noise. Now forget all the external stimuli. Close your eyes and focus on the internal ‘noise’, all the thoughts that are ricocheting around inside your head. It can be quite a lot, especially at times when you’re experiencing ‘monkey brain‘…

Ignoring is Bliss

…and yet, our wonderful brains filter most of those distractions, enabling us to concentrate on reading this sentence and comprehending it. At this point in our lives, if our brains were trying to process every single stimuli we were exposed to throughout the day, we’d be overwhelmed. We’d have to rely on sensory-deprivation tanks to try to maintain our sanity.

When we are new to the world and the world is new to us. While we experience sight, sound, and touch (maybe the most important one) inside the womb, it’s a whole new world when emerge on our initial birthday. And we don’t have any internal noise to distract us from the wonders of the world. Even if our minds were developed enough to ‘think’, our brains are too busy tuning in to everything around us and processing it all. As we learn to use our vision, we begin to relate what we see to what we perceive through our other senses.

As we grow, repeated experiences begin to grow familiar. We start to recognize patterns. This is when we first begin to ‘chunk‘, something we will do for the rest of our lives. Our minds learn to ‘ignore’ things that they’re used to and search for what is different. Our senses slowly become passive. At a young age we reach a stage where we have to consciously choose to taste and touch.

“Caveman Days”

Most of our natural instincts can be traced to evolution/natural selection over the 6 million years humans were on earth prior to last 5,000 years of human civilization. Which is why we often instinctively react as our pre-historic ancestors would have.

We are constantly using our eyes and feeling with our touch, even if it is just the air around us. Our other three senses are relatively passive. But they have evolved to activate automatically and demand the brain’s attention when they detect something out of the ordinary, whether it’s an odd smell, a new sound, or something crossing our field of vision. Our mind quickly processes the new information, decides if it requires further investigation or can be ‘set aside’.

For instance, my neighbor just started mowing her lawn a few minutes ago. At the time I was ‘alerted’ by my brain, processed the sound, and dismissed the alert, all within a fraction of a second, allowing to return to my ‘inner world’ where I’m typing these words, hearing but not listening.

Certain stimuli bypass the whole processing process. If I had heard my neighbor screaming in certain tones, the sound would have gone directly to my amygdala, the fear processing center, and I would have reacted immediately. Researchers believe this is why screaming is usually a ‘reflex action’ something we do instinctively in certain situations. almost a way for our brain to directly communicate with another brain.

The Brain-Body Handshake

[Note: This section summarizes part of Scott Alexander’s Post: It’s Bayes All the Way.] How does our brain decide what to investigate and what to ignore? This is where Bayes comes in. As noted in my post on vision, Bayes Theorem is a mathematical framework for integrating new evidence with prior beliefs. 

If I heard a lion’s roar coming from my neighbor’s yard, I would realize the chances of it being a real lion are exceedingly small. I’d guess it was some other noise that sounded like a lion or someone with a toy that makes lion roaring noises. I might decide to check it out of curiosity, but only at my leisure.

On the other hand, if I heard my neighbor scream after the lion’s roar, or if I were writing this outside at a desk in the middle of the Serengeti, my calculations would be entirely different.

When we encounter something new, our senses gather information on it and send it to the brain. This is Bottom-up processing (which is all we do as newborns). The mind takes this information and tries to fit it into our existing paradigms of the world. This is Top-down processing. Then, according to Corlett, Frith, and Fletcher, a ‘handshake’ takes place between the models existing in our brain and the sensory perceptions our body delivers.

Top-down processing is the Bayesian aspect, fitting what we perceive into the most-likely possibilities based on our knowledge of how the world works. This Bayesian process is closely related to Ockham’s razor, the principle that ‘if several explanations can explain a set of facts, the simplest one is most likely the right one’.

DISCONNECTS

Strange things happen when the handshake does not take place smoothly. This is the basis for most optical illusions.

If you look at either of the two pictures on the left is new to you, you may only see one thing when there are two. The first picture can be either a rabbit or a duck. The second can be either a young lady or an elderly woman. Sometimes if you have made up your mind that the picture is one of the two options it can be hard to see the other one. Once you’ve recognized both options, your brain can jump back and forth quickly.

The third picture may just look like modern art instead of an animal. But once you recognize it, it’s hard not to see it.

Other illusions are more mentally confusing. Many of M. C. Escher’s pictures appear to fly in the face of logic, such as these two showing gravity defying worlds…

or this spinning mask that appears to change direction and appear to ‘pop-out’ at the same time (unless you are a Schizophrenic, drunk, or high)

…our Top-Down processing is so strong that for most of us the brain can’t process the concept of a nose that ‘sticks-in’ instead of ‘sticking-out’, so it just sees what it wants to, reversing the direction of the rotation at a certain point. [If you enjoy this kind of thing, you might want to check out the ‘Paper Dragon Illusion‘]

Why does this matter?

All this matters because it is important to make sure that ‘our handshake’ is working properly to function at our best. Maintaining a proper balance is crucial to our well-being and our long-term mental health.

Balance: Yin and Yang

Besides Schizophrenia, other major issues are associated with the ‘bottom-up’ side being too strong from a general difficulty coping with every day issues to Asperger’s and Autism (though there is a different optical illusion test for that).

The predominant danger for most of us is the ‘top-down’ side dominating. When this happens, we will be more susceptible to ‘confirmation bias‘. We will try too hard to fit incoming data into our existing view of the world instead of giving the new information the fuller evaluation it may deserve.

Challenging our own confirmation bias is an area where we need to be vigilant, but there are more serious issues when our Bayesian process gets out of balance. We are more likely to become victims of Black Swan events with potential serious consequences (9/11) and more likely to engage in destructive group-think.

But the most common problem with becoming too top-down is that we begin to shut ourselves off from the world. When every potentially new thing we are exposed to in our daily lives is categorized and fit into a staid and rigid world view, we’ve become the opposite of the vibrant beings that came into this world, and that’s a sad thing.

“The brain is like a muscle. When it is in use, we feel very good. Understanding is joyous.” Carl Sagan

Our Amazing Bayesian Brains are a treasure to be cherished and nurtured. When neglected, they begin to atrophy just like a muscle in the body, increasing the likelihood of lapsing into Alzheimer’s. But when we feed them and use them, we create new neural pathways that help us stay vibrant and truly alive.

Crazy Eyes / Beautiful Minds [A]

September 4th, 2020

Imagine that you’ve been completely blind (not to be confused with ‘legally blind‘) for as long as you’ve existed. One day you receive the world’s first eye transplant and you are assured it was completely successful. The doctors don’t want to overwhelm you, so they place a simple still image in front of you and then remove the bandages. This is what you might expect to see: 1

Unlike in the movies, you won’t see the world perfectly (and as you do there’s a good chance you won’t recognize what you’re seeing).

Like a camera, the lens of the eye refracts to the retina, turning everything upside down. Within the first week or two of our lives, or in this case seeing for the fist time, our brains figure things out and turn things right-side up.

This process can be reversed. Experiments have been done with special goggles that turn everything ‘upside down’. Within 10 days the brain compensates and makes everything look ‘normal’ (presumably it takes another 10 days to rewire the brain once the goggles are removed). In the meantime, you might miss noticing a famous person

Hocus Focus

Also during this time we learn to focus our eyes, but that takes a little longer, around eight weeks. After a month the same picture might appear something like this:

Blindspotting

By now you’ll have noticed the two black circles on the first two pictures.

Images coming into your eyes are refracted onto the retina. The retina has to communicate to the brain. This is done through the optic nerve. Unfortunately, the part of the retina where the optic nerve is ‘plugged in’ is useless for ‘seeing’ resulting in blind spots in both eyes about 15 degrees away from the center.

The blind spots take up a significant portion of the field of vision (you can test your blind spot here). Fortunately most of us have a second eye to cover for the blind spot in the first eye (and back-up cameras when we can’t use the other eye).

The Third Dimension

Gratuitous Boomer 60’s reference in lieu of 3-D picture

Finally, for the first few months everything will appear two-dimensional to us, becuase our individual eyes only see in two dimensions. Fortunately, we have the second eye to help us out there as well. The brain uses a few different methods to help us gauge distance and put things in perspective.

More on how our brains see in 3-D from this website where this picture comes from

Being blind in one eye makes life difficult, especially for athletes (and Cyclopes). I know of only one pro athlete who overcame this hurdle.

Scanners (don’t) Live in Vain

Our area of focus at any particular microsecond is very small relative to our field of view, like looking through a cardboard tube. When we are actively using our eyes, usually when looking at something unfamiliar, we scan all these areas rapidly and stitch them together into a complete picture in our mind2. Humans can process 10-12 images per second.

Look at this picture for a few moments:

Notice your eyes moving about the picture trying to take in all the action. You can’t take in the whole picture without moving your eyes…and this is a very small portion of your field of vision.

Now, without moving your head, notice what else is around you, below, above, and to either side of the computer screen. While you were studying the picture you were most likely ‘blind’ to those areas…you weren’t scanning them.

But you had a ‘back-up image’ stored in your mind so that if someone had come up behind you and put their hands over your eyes, you could have described pretty well the area around your screen looked like.

…and you weren’t completely blind. Some part of your vision was keeping tabs on those areas so that if any unexpected movement had occurred within your field of vision you’d be alerted immediately and focused on that.

I am a (movie) Camera…

Movies create the illusion of movement by showing us 24 still pictures (Frames) every second. As stated above, Humans can only process around 12 images a second. When we are presented with a greater number, the brain interprets it as movement. This is true of live action, cartoons, claymation, or any other type of film. You can create your own ‘Flipbook movie’ with a small pad of paper and a little patience.

This limit on frame rate, both on film and in real life, is the cause of the ‘Wagon-wheel effect’. A more complete discussion of frame rates is available here.

https://gfycat.com/tangibleindeliblecanine
Demonstration of the ‘Wheel Wagon’ effect (it just looks like a car commercial)

The Eyes Don’t Have It?

There are most likely other examples of ‘defects’ in our vision. But hopefully I’ve presented enough here to convince you that “Seeing is not believing” if you didn’t feel that way already.

It’s just been in the last decade that we’ve begun to realize that in most cases Humans are terrible eyewitnesses (which has had some terrible consequences for some innocent people over the years – but that’s a topic for a different type of blog).

If you’d like more evidence, there are hundreds of other optical illusions out there, like the Wagon-wheel effect, that take advantage of the disconnect between what your eyes actually see and how your mind thinks it sees that may help convince you.

“These are not the black dots you are looking for” (because they aren’t actually there)

Our Lyin’ Eyes / Our Amazin’ Bayesian Brain

Hopefully I’ve disillusioned you from the natural inclination to feel like our eyes are these flawless windows providing perfect input to our brains on everything within our field of vision instantly.

But why do we feel this way? Because of our remarkable minds.

Bayes Theorem

[This brief explanation is cribbed from my second favorite blog, SlateStarCodex – much more on Bayes in another post]

“Bayes Theorem is a mathematical framework for integrating new evidence with prior beliefs”. In other words, you have many preconceived notions of what you expect to see when your ‘field of vision’ suddenly changes (such as going through a door to a new room) or waking up and opening your eyes.

Here’s a quick example…

TAE CHT

…even though the middle letters of both words are exactly the same, you not only read this as “THE CAT” but most likely you didn’t even give much thought to the middle letters until it was pointed out to you. That’s because reading the middle ‘letters’ exactly how they are printed results in nonsense, so your mind seamlessly ‘corrects’ the gibberish letters, first into an H and then an A.

While newborns don’t really have any of these preconceptions because everything is new to them, that’s not the case for the person who started this whole post out.

If you’ve just gained use of your eyes after being totally blind your whole life, your frame of reference will be based on all your experiences up to then. Your mind will start working immediately to reconcile what you’re ‘seeing’ with what it expects. The images will be flipped ‘right-side-up’, the blurriness will go away, the blind spots will be filled in, things will clear up and your mind will paint an apparently perfect beautiful picture…

…and just like the rest of us, you will believe you have ‘perfect vision’.

Thanks for reading! I plan to update this post every so often. Constructive comments are most welcome, especially pointing out spelling/grammatical errors, readability issues, broken/missing links, etc.

The Trolley Folly (or My Problem with “The Trolley Problem”)

August 19, 2020

Angel’s Flight Trolley (recently featured in the reboot of ‘Perry Mason‘)

or “Why There Ain’t No Such Thing as Utilitarianism”

The “Trolley Problem” is a basic thought experiment in Ethics/Philosophy. There are different variations. This is one version:

“You’re riding in a self-driving trolley. You look up to see that you are barreling toward five people on the tracks. You try the emergency brakes but the don’t work. You notice a remote-activated switch that will divert the trolley to another track where one person will be killed instantly, but save the other five.

Doing nothing will result in five deaths, activating the switch will result in one. What do you do?”

GESTAPO AT THE DOOR

Another classic thought experiment goes like this:

“You’ve lived your life believing that lying is a sin that should be avoided at all costs. You are aware of a couple in your neighborhood who are in danger from the current government. You are sympathetic to their beliefs and mistrustful of those in power.

One day the couple knocks frantically on your door. They tell you they are being pursued by the authorities, who want to torture and maybe kill them. You agree to hide them.

“Soon the State Police knock on the door. They show you a picture of the couple and ask if you know where they are. Realizing the consequences, you go against your nature and lie. The authorities believe you, thank you and leave.

Lots of Gestapo!

“You were right to lie in this case, of course…

or so you think.

“A few days later you read in the paper that a terrorist group has unleashed a biological weapon that has killed many thousands of innocent people. The picture of the ringleaders of the group who manufactured and detonated the weapons are of the couple you sheltered.”

The standard version of this thought experiment typically has the couple being Jewish in Hitler’s Germany and the authorities as Nazis. It is usually brought up as an example of when lying is morally correct and/or of the ends justifying the means.

You Kant Make This Stuff Up?

The problem is that this version assumes an omniscience that in my opinion invalidates the thought experiment.

Most people will argue that they’ll know when the bad guys are really bad guys. That’s what the person in both of the above example thought too. But for the sake of argument, let’s assume you do know that for sure. That still leaves open other possibilities…

…the couple, knowing your devotion to honesty, decide to run out the back door, expecting to escape while the Nazis were searching your house. Unfortunately because you didn’t delay them, the Nazis caught the Jews (and probably took you in as well)

…or this couple were really undercover Nazi spies trying to see who could be trusted in the neighborhood and who should be thrown into a concentration camp. You and your family are bundled away.

…or – I’m sure you can think up your own variant.

Emmanuel Kant

This concept for this thought experiment originated with the philosopher Emmanuel Kant. There is a more thorough and erudite discussion of the issues it raises here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2010.01507.x

“Hi Trolley, Neighborhood of ‘Make Believe’”

Mr. Rogers and Mr. Trolley

Returning to the Trolley Problem, the Utilitarian solution is to pull the lever and kill one person instead of five.

…unfortunately, it turns out that you’re going so fast that when the trolley hits the turn to divert it, it jumps the tracks and barrels into a crowded marketplace killing scores of people

…or that everything goes as planned but the 5 people you saved were all convicted pedophile serial-killers working on a chain gang, while the single person was a scientist who had just secretly perfected a vaccine for the latest viral outbreak and figured out a simple solution for Global Warming and was rushing to present his ideas to his colleagues

…or the five people were there intentionally as part of a cult that wanted to commit suicide to get to a better world (where they don’t have useless thought experiments).

I saw one argument that if no one in the group of 5 people was cognizant enough to realize they were about to be killed, then they deserved their fate over the innocent person on the side track who thought they were safe.

We’re not in Kansas anymore (we’re next door in Missouri)

CLANG! CLANG! CLANG!

The problem with these thought experiments is that they assume ‘perfect knowledge’. You may think the authorities are the equivalent of evil Nazis searching for innocent people to persecute, but you cannot ‘know’ that.

Does this mean I would tell the truth in real life in a similar situation? Probably not. But the situation would be much more complicated (how well do I really know these people, am I putting my family in mortal danger, etc.) and I wouldn’t have months or even hours to think about it. That’s not really the point.

All this brings me to Utilitarianism. There are many versions of Utilitarianism, but for purposes of argument I’m going with the one that says that “The greatest good for the greatest number should be the guiding concept”. The opposite is Deontology, which states that an action is right or wrong based on moral rules, regardless of the consequences.

Jeremy Bentham, ‘Founder’ of Utilitarianism

UTILI-TOTALITARIANISM

Utilitarianism has three major problems which invalidate it as a real philosophy, all related to our lack of perfect knowledge.

The first is that the goal is impossible to define. What is this ‘greatest good’? Most often it is assumed to be happiness. But everyone has different ideas of what happiness is, and most of us really don’t know what will make us happy (as is so well pointed out in the books Stumbling on Happiness by Daniel Gilbert and The Happiness Hypothesis by Johnathan Haidt).  

The second major problem with Utilitarianism is not just that we don’t have perfect knowledge, we aren’t even close to having it and probably never will (Is God even sure that he or she is really the highest power?). Compounding that problem is that we think we are much better at predicting the future that we actually are. This year alone we have experienced the Covid-19 virus that unexpectedly dominated the news completely for several months. Then at the end of May, George Floyd was murdered triggering civil unrest and many other repercussions that are still being resolved. As I write this we still have over 4 months left in the year including a major election.

The final problem is defining ‘The Greatest Number’. Does every living person qualify? What about those in a vegetative state? What about those in hospice with terminal illness? What about animals? Most importantly, what about the future generations that haven’t been conceived yet?

Imagine a society where every single person has a happiness level of 70. One day the supreme being comes and tells the people that they can increase their happiness level to 72, but if they are willing to reduce their happiness level to 60, then all future generations will have a happiness level of at least 80.

I don’t believe there is a real definition for Utilitarianism. Therefore, in my opinion, it doesn’t exist.

But even if one accepts an amorphis amorphous ‘definition’, the basic philosophy rests on the idea that the means justify the ends, an ideology not just used to support and rationalize virtually every atrocity/genocide committed in human history, but one that often leads to tragic consequences in our every day lives.

On a pure level, I don’t believe the ends ever justify the means, but that’s a topic for a later post. In the meantime…
…Every day in every situation act as ethically as you are capable of and you’ll be a better and happier person.

Thanks for reading! I plan to update this post every so often. Constructive comments are most welcome, especially pointing out spelling/grammatical errors, readability issues, broken/missing links, etc.

Life is But a Stream…

Updated August 17, 2020 Originally posted: August 5, 2020

If you’re stuck at home and with free time on your hands, this is a perfect time to binge watch. And since you’ve probably already seen all the popular good shows, I’m going to present some other quality shows that may have not caught your attention.

There is a lot of great television out there. There is also an overwhelming amount of crappy TV out there too. But that’s true for all art and always will be (and that’s a topic for another post). There are plenty of guides out there for the well-known shows like The Wire, The Americans, Breaking Bad, and so on. This is my list of shows to stream that may have slipped below your radar.

All of these suggestions require subscriptions, but most of the services offer free trials of at least a week, so if you play your binging cards right, you can game the system at least long enough to decide if you want to invest more of your time and your money.

What I Look For…and What I Don’t

Before I get to the recommendations, a few things you should know:

For me to recommend a show it has to have an interesting plot, superior writing (dialogue), and be well-acted. Good cinema-photography is almost as essential. I like having interesting things to look at, which is part of the reason I’m partial to Historical Fiction and Science Fiction.

I like things that educate me, either because I learn new things or think about something in a new way. For that reason among others, I’m not a fan of action shows or movies. Those must be exceptional for me to recommend one. Lack of realism (why can’t the bad guys ever shoot straight or hit anything with an automatic weapon?) requires too much suspension of belief. The dialogue is predictable and often painful. None have made this list.

I’m not a big fan of murder (detective) shows either. They just seem kind of macabre to me, not to mention over the top in their own way. I enjoyed the Inspector Morse series, but seriously, the murder rate in that fictional Oxford rivals that of East Baltimore. None of those made it either.

What Makes a Superior Series

I strongly prefer self-contained series. I like when characters and some plot aspects carry over from year to year but each season tells its own story (like The Wire).

I do not like cliff-hanger series. First, because there is the chance the show itself may not get renewed (The OA, Travelers, etc.). Netflix shows in particular often don’t make it past two seasons. Secondly, I may have enjoyed the first season or two but had my fill of the premise and don’t want to be strung along for another season (or ten)

There are many shows with interesting concepts that run their course after one or two seasons and after that I feel trapped and cheated. They are stringing me along so I can get a resolution [The Man in the High Castle for example, which should have been only 2 seasons].  Not everything needs to be resolved in a season, but if the main conflict is not then it’s got be exceptional for me to recommend it. More on all this in at the very bottom of this page (with spoilers)

There are a lot of excellent Foreign Shows and I have included several. You can probably watch the dubbed versions, but I believe it is a much better experience to read the subtitles and listen to the original actors. You might even pick up a little of the language along the way. Finally, I have not included much information about the shows themselves. If you’re interested in that, Google is right next door, but if I think a show (or movie, book, etc.) is going to be worth watching (reading), I prefer to know as little about as possible beforehand and get to experience it all fresh from the start.

and Finally…

None of these shows is violent or overtly sexual. A couple may be objectionable and are so noted in the descriptions.

For most of these shows you’ll know by the end of the first episode if it’s your thing or not. All of them score well over 90% on Rotten Tomatoes and almost as high on Metacritic (which I prefer – Rotten Tomatoes scores seem grade inflated).

There are several shows here with episodes that are 30-minutes or less which means you could easily binge a whole season in an afternoon. Those have been noted – all the other shows are approximately one-hour long.

The picture accompanying each suggestion links to the show. The Hyperlinked titles take you to the Wikipedia page for the show.

Self-contained Series In very rough order or recommendation:

The Expanse

The Expanse [Amazon] 4 seasons (and counting) – Science Fiction Space series based on the best-selling books of the same name by James S. A. Corey. Both the books and the series are excellent, and the series is faithful to the books. The casting is perfect. Be patient with this one, it doesn’t start to hit its stride until the second season, but unlike most series this one just keeps getting better. Like the books, there is an ongoing story arc, but each season is a self-contained story as well. [10 Episodes per season]

My Brilliant Friend

My Brilliant Friend [HBO] 2 seasons (out of 4) [Italian w/subtitles]- Like The Expanse, a series based on a book series. This series is even more faithful to the critically acclaimed books by Elena Ferrante. Like The Expanse, the casting is perfect. Also like the Expanse, it has an ongoing story arc, but each season is self-contained [8 Episodes per season]

Wolf Hall

Wolf Hall [PBS Masterpiece (through Amazon)] 1 season (out of 2) – Historical fiction about Thomas Cromwell, a major player in the court of King Henry the VIII, based on the award winning trilogy by Hilary Mantel. A well-done adaption but not thorough – the first season is only six episodes and covers the first two books (which are well worth reading or listening to – the audio versions are exceptional). The third book, The Mirror and the Light, was just published this year and BBC has confirmed it will be adapted for TV.

BoJack Horseman

BoJack Horseman [Netflix] 6th and final season recently released. Adult animation about a washed-up TV star who happens to be a horse. Witty writing, constant clever sight gags, good ‘acting’, all while covering ethical dilemmas. Think The Simpsons during it’s best seasons. I’m watching this now and only in the middle of Season 2, but I’ve seen enough to recommend it.

Of all the shows I fully recommend here, this is the one that comes closest to being a comedy. There are several reasons for that which I hope to explore in a later post, but basically humor is such a personal thing that I hesitate to make or take recommendations on ‘funny shows’. This one has the kind of humor I enjoy, for better or worse.

Russian Doll

Russian Doll [Netflix] – 1 Season (at least one more to come) – Groundhog Day type fantasy comedy/drama starring Natasha Lyonne. Self-contained season. This one you might take a couple episodes to get in to. [8 30-minute Episodes]

Fleabag

Fleabag [Amazon] – 2 Seasons only – Difficult to describe, but well done all the way around – numerous awards and a 100% Rotten Tomatoes rating. Created, written, and starring Phoebe Waller-Bridges based on her one-woman show first performed in 2013.

Be patient with this one. I didn’t feel it really hit its stride until the second season when Andrew Scott’s role became bigger. Fortunately, you can watch the whole series in under 6 hours. Adult comedy.  [6 30-minute Episodes per season] {Sexual Situations and Inuendo}

After Life

After Life [Netflix] – 2 Seasons (at least one more to come) – Funny, poignant, and insightful. Only above average reviews, though I wonder if some of this is just backlash at Ricky Gervais for not playing nice at the Golden Globes. If you enjoy Gervais’ humor (Original The Office, Extras), then you’ll most likely enjoy this. If you don’t, then give it a miss. And if your nor familiar with his brand of humor, you will in the first 15 minutes. [6 30-minute Episodes per season]

Deutschland 83, 86, & 89

Deutschland ’83 & Deutschland ‘86 [Hulu] 3rd and final season (Deutschland ’89) upcoming – [German and English w/subtitles] This is the first of four German shows to make this list. Comedy/Drama about a young East German recruited to be a spy in West Berlin. Corresponds to actual historical events. [8/10 Episodes]

Dark

Dark [Netflix] – 3 Seasons only [German w/Subtitles] My second German show is an odd one. It’s like a German Stranger Things without any of the cuteness [Macaroni and cheese vs. Hearty German Stew according to one review]. The music is sinister to the point of almost being over-the-top at times. The plot revolves around time travel but in as plausible a way as a time-travel plot can be. It becomes very complicated in the 3rd season (I found this character guide and this plot guide helpful), but I don’t think I’m spoiling anything by saying things will become clear by the end of the last episode. [10/8/8 Episodes]

On-Going Series in no particular order

Babylon Berlin

Babylon Berlin [Netflix] – 3 Seasons with a least one more to come [German w/Subtitles (three in a row). Sort of like a mystery version Cabaret without the singing. Loosely based on the books by Volker Kutscher. I only read the first book but based on that the TV show is a vast improvement. A Tom Tykwer (Run, Lola, Run) project; Set in Berlin during the Weimar Republic in the late 1920’s. [8/8/12 Episodes]

Undone

Undone [Amazon] – 1 Season (with at least one more to come) – Gorgeously animated in a realistic style. A SF/Fantasy comedy/drama involves the main character being able to do some kind of weird Blly Pilgrim type time-travel thing.  [8 24-minute episodes]

Messiah

Messiah [Netflix] – 1 Season (with at least one more to come) – I debated about this one. I’m not sure it qualifies for ‘under the radar’, and while I find the concept fascinating, I can’t see how the show is going to resolve the main issue (is a guy mysteriously appearing in the Mid-East appearing to perform Jesus-like miracles real or fake?) in a satisfactory way. But I appreciated the unique premise and spiritual aspects to give it a qualified recommendation. [10 episodes]

Others – worth a mention:

Battlestar Galactica

Battlestar Galactica [SyFy] – This is an old one from 2004, not the really old one from 1978 with Lorne Greene…and fans of that show seem to hate this one for some reason.

I’m including it because I think it flew under the radar back in the day and it meets all my criteria.

It’s 76 episodes and does suffer the curse of some longer-running series. The plot meanders sometimes – one season in particular, assumedly because the show-runners weren’t sure if the show was going to be renewed. But overall it’s well cast and plotted enough to keep your interest.

Great if you are down for a long-term Science Fiction binge. Also available for a fee on Amazon if you can’t stream SyFy to your TV.

The Midnight Gospel

The Midnight Gospel [Netflix] 1 Season so far. I cannot even begin to describe this show. It’s an animated series set in a different dimension. The animation is often violent and occasionally R-rated, but the content is based on a podcast called The Duncan Trussel Family Hour and over the episodes covers a lot of topics such as Christianity, Enlightenment, Self-Awareness, Zen, Meditation, and Death.

I liked it and will watch it again for the content. But it’s so bizarre I didn’t feel comfortable making it a recommendation [8 episodes averaging 30 minutes] {Graphic Cartoon Violence,Sexual Innuendo, Drug references, etc.}

The Ministry of Time

The Ministry of Time [???] 3 seasons (out of 4) [Spanish w/subtitles El Ministerio del Tiempo] – This show has disappeared from Netflix since I began working on this post a while back. It is unfortunate that this is also the best Family friendly show of all those I recommend here
It looks like it may be on HBO sometime in the future. In the meantime, I think enough of it to recommend you seek it out with your own devices.
I’ll update availability when I know more.

Science Fiction Time Travel show that doesn’t take itself too seriously but isn’t a comedy. Beautifully written and acted. It’s also an opportunity to learn about Spanish history and culture (more interesting than you might think). Not rated on Rotten Tomatoes. [Season 1 is 8 Episodes, Seasons 2 & 3 are each 13 Episodes]

Never Look Away

Never Look Away [Starz/DVD] Cheating here for now (this is a movie, not a TV show) [German w/English subtitles].
I feel like fewer movies slip under the radar, but I think this one did. Set in Germany/East Germany, well-acted thriller loosely based on the life of the artist Gerhard Richter. Tom Schilling is a magnificent actor [worth checking out in the Series The Same Sky which unfortunately was left unfinished after one season]

Perhaps I’ll do a similar post on movies in the future and move this there. It the meantime this post will be updated as my horizons expand.

Thanks for reading, especially if you’ve made it this far! I plan to update this post every so often. Constructive comments are most welcome, especially pointing out spelling/grammatical errors, broken/missing links, readability issues, etc. Suggestions for shows to be considered for future updates would be great as well

BONUS: Why Good Series Go Bad

ARGH! SPOILERS AHEAD MATEY!

This section contains general discussions of the several shows. I’ll be mentioning several shows and per format they will be italicized. Shows where I’ll be discussing plot points will be highlighted in BOLD so you can stop reading before anything is given away. I’ll try to limit the spoilers as much as possible.

The modern television landscape is littered with series that had strong first seasons and then went downhill, usually slowly (The Man in the High Castle, Homeland), sometimes drastically (Westworld). If the show is good enough in other aspects (concept, writing, acting, etc.), it can often recover from a mediocre season given enough time.

Life from All Sides

The title of this blog stems from Joni Mitchell’s 1969 song Both Sides, Now.

You can be inside our outside a cloud, in or out of love, on the winning or losing side, but life itself has infinite sides.

Those unique sides are what make life so interesting.

This blog is my attempt to present some of the interesting sides I’ve found in hopes not just that you’ll find them interesting as well, but that they will somehow inspire you to see some other sides you hadn’t noticed before and share them as well.

Rory

August 5th, 2020